|
Post by DC3Td on Feb 13, 2009 16:26:22 GMT 10
Just been reading what the Administrator posted re what can/can`t,should/shouldn`t etc be posted on here. Really with all else that is happening across the world and moreso closer to home,the tragedy in Victoria, isn`t the banning of a member just a tad petty.I understand there`s rules to be applied & lived by here. I understand we all get hot under the collar from time to time & maybe a PM shouldn`t be posted for all & sundry to view but isn`t this Forum Public Domain? If words weren`t changed in the original PM & banned member felt unjustly done by don`t they have a right to say so? I got ticked off a few weeks ago because i felt aggrieved about some posts i put up & others felt their noses being put out. Yet i still see the very same thing i did is being carried on by other members.And do we need George & Charles Merriams (USA)definitions to control an issue that ordinarily you find happening on just about any other site across this digital world we live in? I don`t have the answer. I come here to see/hear about other members stuff.To learn maybe a little of something i mightn`t know about re our favourite pastime.Have a laugh along the way. Lifes too damn short to be bitching about 'he said this/ he said that'. I hope in due course that differences can be settled.I doubt it will.But who knows. Well just my two cents worth.Not too cheery today.
|
|